| Home >> Directory of sheep and wolves

Correspondence with Mrs. Katrina Kaczala
(Raising of the Pride Flag at St. Jerome's University)

Logos of Waterloo and St. Jerome Universities.
All knees will bend before our flag!
All knees will bend before our flag!
[Source]

Table of contents

1) S. Jetchick (2020-May-28)
2) SJU List Administrator (2020-May-29)
3) S. Jetchick (2020-May-29)
4) S. Jetchick (2020-May-30)

1) S. Jetchick (2020-May-28)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: University-level debate (respectful and rational)
on "honoring" sodomy at St. Jerome?
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:16:53 -0400
From: Stefan Jetchick
To: kakaczal (add "at sign" here) uwaterloo.ca

Quebec City, May 28th, A.R.S.H. 2020.


Mrs. Katrina Kaczala
Executive Assistant, Office of the President and Vice Chancellor
St. Jerome's University
290 Westmount Rd. North
Waterloo, ON
N2L 3G3
T. 519-884-8111 Ext. 28388


Good day Mrs. Kaczala,

I heard through the grapevine that St. Jerome's University was
going to hold a ceremony for the raising the "pride" flag this
first of July.

Since your institution calls itself a "university" and not a
"snowflake warehouse", I assume St. Jerome would be more than
happy to host, also on July 1st 2020, a debate on this topic:

	"Whether sodomy is against nature?"

I propose as first rule of this debate:

	"The first one to invoke a religious belief, loses!"

Raising flags to "honor" sexual proclivities seems rather
odd for an institution that is supposed to concentrate on
transmitting Science, and teaching Critical Thinking skills.

A respectful and rational debate on the topic seems like
the perfect antidote. Moreover, the debate can be entirely
conducted via e-mails posted on the official website of
your institution, so all generations can be enlightened by
the wisdom of whoever ordered this ceremony.

Sincerely,

Stefan Jetchick
[Usual contact information]

P.S. Could you please sent me a nice picture of the ceremony,
so I can add it to this web page? Thank you!

2) SJU List Administrator (2020-May-29)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Request to mailing list sjucas-spring, Sjufaculty, Sjustaff rejected
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 08:58:02 -0400
From: sjucas-spring-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca,
sjufaculty-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca, sjustaff-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca
To: @inquisition.ca

Your request to the sjucas-spring, Sjufaculty, Sjustaff mailing list

    Posting of your message titled "University-level debate
(respectful and rational) on "honoring" sodomy at St. Jerome?"

has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:

"Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list."

Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
at:

    sjucas-spring-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca
    sjufaculty-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca
    sjustaff-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca

3) S. Jetchick (2020-May-29)

SJU decisions must be adored, not put into question.
SJU decisions must be adored, not put into question.
[Source]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Request to SJU mailing list rejected
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 12:29:45 -0400
From: Stefan Jetchick
To: sjucas-spring-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca,
sjufaculty-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca, sjustaff-owner@lists.uwaterloo.ca

Good day "SJU List Administrator",

>> Your request to the [...] mailing list [...]
>> has been rejected [...] Non-members are not
>> allowed to post messages

Why not?

How could a member post the kind of message I tried
to post? That would be a "career-limiting move"!
Pro-sodomy propaganda at the institutional level means
that anybody working for that institution is in danger
of being fired if they dare criticize the "sacred cow".

That is why it's an outsider (me) who has the academic
freedom to call for a debate on the topic. There are
many people inside SJU who agree with me, but who also
live in fear. Even your reaction is yet another clue that
SJU does not cherish respectful and rational debates, unless
those debates promise to respect the "sacred cows" of SJU...

Why not re-post my message yourself? You're a Member, no?
Why not behave like a Free Citizen? Why not react like a
Real University, and encourage debates? Is SJU's
decision to "honor" sodomy so intellectually fragile and
morally weak, that even a little debate is perceived
as a mortal threat?

Cheers!

Stefan Jetchick

4) S. Jetchick (2020-May-30)

Waterloo University's President and Vice-Chancellor Feridun Hamdullahpur.
Waterloo University's President and Vice-Chancellor Feridun Hamdullahpur.
[Source]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: A risk to the reputation of Waterloo University?
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 09:59:20 -0400
From: Stefan Jetchick
To: president_a_uwaterloo.ca, gradapp_a_uwaterloo.ca,
development_a_uwaterloo.ca, media.relations_a_uwaterloo.ca,
resselment_a_uwaterloo.ca, hire.talent_a_uwaterloo.ca,
communityrelations_a_uwaterloo.ca, alumni_a_alumni.uwaterloo.ca,
joyce.barlow_a_uwaterloo.ca

Good day Mr. President and Vice-Chancellor Feridun Hamdullahpur,
Good day all,

Does the University of Waterloo have any pride?

Is there a reputation of academic excellence, critical
thinking, and openess to debate, that Waterloo can be
proud of?

I say this because the Internet never forgets, and right
now the University of Waterloo (through St. Jerome's)
seems to be on the verge of indulging in the most
anti-university behavior imaginable: propaganda.

St. Jerome's University is planning on "raising the pride
flag" in a couple of days, while simultaneously shutting
down the possibility of a rational and respectful debate
about what this public ceremony is all about.

Please see here for Waterloo University's reputational risk:

	Raising of the Pride Flag at St. Jerome's University
	www.jesus-eucharistie.org/corr/kaczala_katrina.htm

Sincerely,

Stefan Jetchick
[Usual contact information]

Pride in sodomy? Trust the experts!
[Source]

| Home >> Directory of sheep and wolves